Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after

From: marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after
Date: 2010-02-15 09:36:40
Message-ID: b1b9fac61002150136x26be6083g780f9414045b63e1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 08:13:32 Tom Lane wrote:
>> Actually, looking closer, some of the Windows machines started failing
>> after the *earlier* patch to add directory fsyncs.
> And not only the windows machines. Seems sensible to add a configure check
> whether directory-fsyncing works.

It looks like a thing that can be filesystem-dependent. Maybe a kind
of runtime check?

Greetings
Marcin Mańk

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2010-02-15 10:02:50 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2010-02-15 09:27:12 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add psql tab completion for DO blocks.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-02-15 09:40:36 Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION
Previous Message Leonardo F 2010-02-15 09:33:34 Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch