| From: | Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Scholz <alexander(dot)scholz1(at)freenet(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Indices for select count(*)? |
| Date: | 2005-12-21 21:25:06 |
| Message-ID: | b0f3f5a10512211325q7e382bbbga81c78242fbb7313@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/21/05, Alexander Scholz <alexander(dot)scholz1(at)freenet(dot)de> wrote:
> Regarding the performance flow when trying to find out how many records
> are currently being stored in the table, I don't see how an index should
> help... Nevertheless we've created an unique index on "ID" but SELECT
> count("ID") from "XYZ" still takes 35 seconds*. (ID is the primary key
> basing on a sequence, select count(*) isn't faster.)
I would like to redirect you to the zillions of mailing list posts
about this subject :-).
> So - what kind of indexing would speed this up then?
None.
greetings,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas Barbier
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-12-21 21:38:11 | Re: Memory Question |
| Previous Message | Benjamin Arai | 2005-12-21 21:15:17 | Memory Question |