From: | "Arcadius A(dot)" <ahouans(at)sh(dot)cvut(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL query help! |
Date: | 2002-11-27 19:34:32 |
Message-ID: | as36oc$2ss7$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Hello!
"Luis Sousa" <llsousa(at)ualg(dot)pt> wrote in message
news:3DE498E4(dot)2050002(at)ualg(dot)pt(dot)(dot)(dot)
> This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
>
> --------------ms080209060900030807050408
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Tell me what did you try with limit and group by.
> Where's IN, why don't you use EXISTS instead. It runs much master !
>
Thanks for the reply!
Alright, I'll use EXISTS instead of IN .... I didn't know that EXISTS is
faster.....
About my query, I have tried :
"
SELECT * FROM entry where isapproved='y' AND EXISTS (SELECT id
FROM subcategory WHERE catid='2') ORDER BY subcatid DESC LIMIT 5;
";
This will return only 5 rows....
But when I add the GROUP BY, then I got error
"
SELECT * FROM entry where isapproved='y' AND EXISTS (SELECT id
FROM subcategory WHERE catid='2') ORDER BY subcatid DESC LIMIT 5 GROUP BY
subcatid;
"
: ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "GROUP"
Thanks.....
Arcadius.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-27 19:42:10 | Re: fatal error in database |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-27 19:27:14 | Re: How was my PG compiled |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2002-11-27 19:44:02 | Re: Request from eWeek for 7.3 comments |
Previous Message | Ken Hirsch | 2002-11-27 19:22:55 | Re: nested transactions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Childs | 2002-11-27 20:04:40 | Re: Question on SQL and pg_-tables |
Previous Message | Nathan Young | 2002-11-27 17:37:07 | Re: join question |