Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: fn ln <emuser20140816(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions
Date: 2019-08-29 13:01:11
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1908291440490.28828@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers


Hello,

> transaction_read_only must be 'on' because AND CHAIN test sets the
> default_transaction_read_only to 'on'.

> Failure of this test means that the transaction was chained from an
> implicit transaction, which is not our desired behavior. Perhaps you are
> using a wrong binary?

Nope, I blindly assumed that your patch was self contained, but it is not,
and my test did not include the initial fix.

The usual approach is to send self-contained and numbered patches,
eg "chain-fix-1.patch", "chain-fix-2.patch", and so on, unless there are
complex patches designed to be committed in stages.

For the expected result, I was wrongly assuming that "SET TRANSACTION" was
session persistent, which is not the case, there is a "SET SESSION …" for
that. Moreover, the usual transaction default is read-write, so I was a
little surprise. It would help to show the (unusual) current setting
before the test.

I also have registered the patch to the CF app:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/24/2265/

But I cannot fill in your name, maybe you could register and add it, or it
can be left blank.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message fn ln 2019-08-29 13:55:47 Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions
Previous Message fn ln 2019-08-29 12:35:43 Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-08-29 13:32:35 Re: no mailing list hits in google
Previous Message Pavel Demidov 2019-08-29 12:55:17 pg_resetwal and --wal-segsize