Re: Performance and IN clauses

From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance and IN clauses
Date: 2008-11-18 16:12:24
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.1.10.0811181610310.4666@aragorn.flymine.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Kynn Jones wrote:
> Also, assuming that the optimal way to write the query depends on the length of $node_list, how can I estimate the
> "critical length" at which I should switch from one form of the query to the other?

In the past, I have found the fastest way to do this was to operate on
groups of a bit less than a thousand values, and issue one query per
group. Of course, Postgres may have improved since then, so I'll let more
knowledgable people cover that for me.

Matthew

--
Heat is work, and work's a curse. All the heat in the universe, it's
going to cool down, because it can't increase, then there'll be no
more work, and there'll be perfect peace. -- Michael Flanders

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tv 2008-11-18 16:38:45 Re: Performance and IN clauses
Previous Message Kynn Jones 2008-11-18 15:53:19 Performance and IN clauses