Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?
Date: 2009-06-02 05:09:49
Message-ID: alpine.BSO.2.00.0906020108410.15690@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Robert Haas wrote:

> Regarding this item:
>
> * Consider reverting preventing regular users from base type creation
>
> You raise this point:
>
> tgl says: whether or not we think PL/Java is bulletproof, there are
> other problems, for instance this one
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/87zlnwnvjg.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
>
> That's a pretty overwhelming argument for leaving it as-is. I think
> we should remove this from the list of open items.

Yes, that makes sense to me as the original requester of this open item.
I thought it had been taken off a while ago.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-06-02 06:40:02 Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file
Previous Message Jeremy Kerr 2009-06-02 03:52:33 [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections