From: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: swik.net is copying planetpostgresql content |
Date: | 2008-05-26 22:23:24 |
Message-ID: | af1bce590805261523g2da74015r3f910ac5090e7432@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
For what it's worth, this is my take on it as well, and I agree with all
points below.
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> > It seems this wiki is fetching all Planet PostgreSQL content and adding
> > anything to their own wiki - without even a link back to planet.
> > Any planet link is rewritten to match the wiki structure.
>
> Not sure what you mean by this? EVery article I looked at does link back to
> the originating blog. All the links in my article, for example, still work
> exactly as I wrote them:
>
>
> http://swik.net/PostgreSQL/Planet+Postgresql/Greg+Sabino+Mullane%3A+DBD%3A%3APg+advanced+tracing+options/b3sdf
>
> or: http://tinyurl.com/54lg28
>
> > In addition they change any license to: "All original text is available
> > as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike".
>
> That means any text *not copied from somewhere else* is under CCA-S. In
> other words, anything created on their site. Which seems perfectly valid
> to me.
>
> > This behavior gives (of course) top positions in any search engine
> > result - but i'm not sure that all planet feeds find this amusing.
> > Just spoke with Devrim about that and his opinion is to let the
> > community decide.
>
> What makes you think that they get "top position" in a search engine
> result?
> Searching for "DBD::Pg tracing" gives my original article as the top
> result,
> with swik.net not even showing up at all.
>
> They are simply parsing the RSS feed, and they *do* link back to
> planetpostgres,
> including the "Continue reading" bit, so I'm not seeing this as a really
> big deal.
> If they weren't linking back to PP at all, this might matter, but because
> they
> do, this is actually a good thing and probably helps PP's Google rating.
>
> - --
> Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
> PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200805261738
> http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iEYEAREDAAYFAkg7L3QACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjh/QCeNfyAsxQKnBIT0HMsPr4aW/KS
> 8W8AoPgsAB/eWVO/Oaqs1hvldfs0OrV5
> =NJjv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-05-27 02:21:50 | Re: swik.net is copying planetpostgresql content |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-05-26 22:21:45 | Re: swik.net is copying planetpostgresql content |