Re: the case for machine-readable error fields

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> If that's what we're trying to solve, I don't think that adding some
> kind of proprietary shorthand coding is a good idea. If we're do to
> this at all, it should be a connection-based GUC option, and use some
> standard formal like XML fragments.

+1 to this idea in general, but *please* don't consider the use of
XML. If we really need some sort of formatting, let's do CSV. Or
YAML. Or JSON. Anything but XML.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200908041806
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkp4sOoACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjItACgsDtcid8Zqx9J2ehIhqbtN1l3
1jMAoNcd/6eJPBkKbdNYx6wbUl3bnxhC
=H5yv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----