Re: Indication of db-shared tables

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Indication of db-shared tables
Date: 2011-06-22 03:24:34
Message-ID: a5abf2be8583405342acc3d4b16b427f@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> Do we do enough to show which tables are db shared, e.g. pg_database? I
> don't see any indication from psql \dS. Are our docs clear enough?

I don't think \dS should be indicating such a thing. I think it's documented
well enough: if you are doing something that it matters enough which
tables are shared, you really oughtta know about them anyway.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201106212323
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk4BYF8ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjOYACgnDq27MbRCg4Dr7QL/p6tq1kj
3EwAoPnJCqazL+akS1Au5WoxB5RvceDu
=RpBk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-22 03:25:21 Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-22 03:15:43 Re: WIP pgindent replacement