Re: Beginner Questions Please: Which To Go With ?

From: Al Cohen <al(dot)cohen(at)e-greek(dot)please(dot)no(dot)junk(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Beginner Questions Please: Which To Go With ?
Date: 2004-03-19 21:12:04
Message-ID: _u6cnTsQYr-Q_8bdRWPC-w@speakeasy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

For learning about databases, probably I'd recommend them in this order:

1. Access
2. mySQL
3. PostgreSQL

Access has a really good GUI user interface for playing around, but you
can still use SQL, although the last time I checked it was Microsoft's
somewhat-different SQL.

MySQL is trivial to set up.

PostgreSQL really requires a little knowledge to be used.

Note that if you were looking for suggestions on which of these to use
in an actual production system, my recommendations would be reversed.
As of the last time I used it, Access has a hideous database backend
with a nifty unfixable random autocorrupt feature. MySQL is not a
"real" database, although much better than Access. PostgreSQL is
amazing - full-featured, fast, and sturdy.

Good luck!

Al Cohen
www.alcohen.com

Robert11 wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Am about to sign up for an on-line database course (introductory)
>
> Apparently, one must have on their PC for the course either
>
> Access
> postgre
> mysql
>
> Am really new at this.
> Access is a problem, as the package costs is $200.00 Wow !
>
> I downloaded postgre, but I am a bit stumped on
> what to do next.
> The problem is I'm totally unfamiliar with ftp downloads.
>
> There are a bunch of folders.
>
> What do I open, or do next, please, to get started ?
>
> I would like to evaluate postgre and mysql before the course actually
> starts.
>
> Also: what are the major differences between all 3 packages ?
>
> Which would be easiest to learn for a true database beginner ?
>
> Should perhaps I go with Access despite the cost ? Is it "easier", or are
> the screens and interface 'better" ?
>
> Want to learn one database fairly well, as I think it's something I should
> know, and would also look good on a job resume.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>
>
> lease, to get started
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Krall 2004-03-19 22:23:43 Re: pg_dump on older version of postgres eating huge
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-19 21:00:17 Re: pg_dump on older version of postgres eating huge