ALTER SEQUENCE: Missing feature?

From: david(at)fetter(dot)org (David Fetter)
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: ALTER SEQUENCE: Missing feature?
Date: 2004-02-01 18:46:48
Message-ID: ZpidnWHrVNoF1IDdXTWc-w@speakeasy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kind people,

The fine folks in #postgresql brought this up, and it seems like,
well, a bug. In order to make certain kinds of changes on a SEQUENCE,
you have to issue an ALTER TABLE statement. Shouldn't alterations
like RENAME TO, OWNER, etc. to a SEQUENCE all (be able to) go through
ALTER SEQUENCE? What else might this impact?

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

Before you try to play the history card, make sure it's in your hand.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ohp 2004-02-01 19:11:03 how can I get read of that
Previous Message alban 2004-02-01 18:16:49 SPI find backend id (novice)