Re: [HACKERS] libpq++

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq++
Date: 1999-03-29 21:15:33
Message-ID: XFMail.990329161533.vev@michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 29-Mar-99 Tom Lane wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
>>> Who are maintainer of libpq++?
>
>> I was going to when things settled down, but a couple of months ago
>> someone else posted to hackers that they had an immediate need and was
>> going to so I backed off.
>
> I haven't noticed any patches getting posted, however, so whoever-it-was
> seems to have lost interest. Vince, if you still are interested in
> adopting libpq++, it desperately needs a caring parent ;-)

Looking at it now. I see the first thing I'm going to have to do is
fix the docs - second actually, I need to find out why it didn't build
in my tree in the first place back when I went thru the docs in December.

Are there any glaring problems that require immediate attention that you
know of? I see it hasn't been touched since around '97.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 1999-03-29 23:31:22 Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use?
Previous Message geek+ 1999-03-29 20:07:20 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2