RE: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS

From: Dmitry Samersoff <dms(at)wplus(dot)net>
To: Jose Soares <jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com>
Cc: general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS
Date: 2000-02-22 12:13:12
Message-ID: XFMail.20000222151312.dms@wplus.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


On 22-Feb-2000 Jose Soares wrote:
> begin transaction;
> create table tmp(a int);
> insert into tmp values (1);
> insert into tmp values (1000000000000000000000000000000000);
> ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "1000000000000000000000000000000000":
> Numerical result out of range
> commit;
> select * from tmp;
> ERROR: tmp: Table does not exist.
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Interbase, Oracle,Informix,Solid,Ms-Access,DB2:
^^^^^^^^^
AFAIK, MS Access have no transactions inside it,
Informix (at least old versions I worked with) always
perform create,drop, alter object outside transaction
but IMHO it's not right behavior.

I believe postgres's behavior more meaningful,
but IMHO, this example is quite far from real life.

--
Dmitry Samersoff, dms(at)wplus(dot)net, ICQ:3161705
http://devnull.wplus.net
* There will come soft rains ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-22 13:05:26 Re: [GENERAL] auto number
Previous Message Jose Soares 2000-02-22 11:47:44 TRANSACTIONS

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sszabo 2000-02-22 12:15:20 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-22 12:07:29 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?