Re: Index creation takes for ever

From: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index creation takes for ever
Date: 2003-09-01 19:59:11
Message-ID: Pine.UW2.4.53.0309012157180.23297@server.pyrenet.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Hi Tom,
I've made some tests with your qsort and it DEFINITIVLY help
~3 mn instead of 69.

However this is for 7.3.4 I've got no probs with 7.4b.
Did something change in btree creation?
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 08:46:09 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever
>
> ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr writes:
> > it took 69 minutes to finish, 75% of this time was devoted to create 2
> > indexes on varchar(2) with value being 'O', 'N' or null;
> > I wonder if it's a configuration matter.
>
> I still say it's either strcoll or qsort's fault. Try swapping in our
> own version of qsort to see if the behavior changes.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
6, Chemin d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tommi Mäkitalo 2003-09-01 19:59:17 TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2003-09-01 19:45:19 Re: Preliminary notes about hash index concurrency (long)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-01 20:03:17 Re: Index creation takes for ever
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-01 12:46:09 Re: Index creation takes for ever