Re: your mail

From: Oleg Broytmann <phd(at)sun(dot)med(dot)ru>
To: Angelos Karageorgiou <angelos(at)awesome(dot)incredible(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: your mail
Date: 1999-02-11 16:02:32
Message-ID: Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.990211190033.948A-100000@sun.med.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Angelos Karageorgiou wrote:
> > For me it seems like a compiler (or compiler option) problem - signed
> > vs. unsigned chars.
>
> Yes you are right , the problem is BSD/OS specific , and indeed it has to
> do with unsigned chars vs signed chars. I just did not know if others had
> the problem too and since and a cast to (unsigned char) has no effect to
> an 8bit char I decided to post the patch.
>
> Even test-ctype gives out different results when cp is cast as unsigned
> chat and not a plain char. would you like the output from test-ctype for
> unsigned chars ?

I am not sure. This should be discussed among other developers. What we
should use: signed or unsigned chars, anyone has an idea?

> BTW i appreciate the work on postgres it is an awesome package

Welcome!

Oleg.
----
Oleg Broytmann http://members.xoom.com/phd2/ phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roberto Joao Lopes Garcia 1999-02-11 16:26:12 date_part() BUG?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-11 15:44:57 Re: [HACKERS] TIME QUALIFICATION