| From: | Oleg Broytmann <phd(at)sun(dot)med(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |
| Date: | 1998-12-14 13:44:39 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.981214164103.18803A-200000@sun.med.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello!
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> OK, I'm not arguing strongly against it, but imho the current code is
> not broken on any major *mature* platform :) The glibc2 stuff is fairly
> new, and everyone is still working out the details. We apparently
> understand the problem, but we haven't seen Oleg's patches to know what
> he actually did, whether the patches we are planning fix his problem, or
> what the effects are on machines (even of the same type) outside of his
> own.
I haven't worked out a real patch yet. I did a little patch for
configure.in/config.h.in, but you already committed the same patch. :)
I did a patch for datetime regression test (attached). The patch
triggers an error on glibc2. Works right on Solaris. I am not sure whether
we should include the patch into regression test...
Oleg.
----
Oleg Broytmann http://members.tripod.com/~phd2/ phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| datetime-regression-patch | text/plain | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Broytmann | 1998-12-14 13:47:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 1998-12-14 10:17:15 | Re: [HACKERS] ecpg man page |