Re: [ADMIN] re: binary/build woes, procedural question

From: Oleg Broytmann <phd(at)sun(dot)med(dot)ru>
To: "Gilley, Charles H(dot)" <Charles(dot)Gilley(at)glenayre(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-admin'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] re: binary/build woes, procedural question
Date: 1998-10-14 14:44:22
Message-ID: Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.981014184202.27023C-100000@sun.med.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi!

On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Gilley, Charles H. wrote:
> Well, I'm being stymied from all directions in getting 6.3.2 to run on my
> Ultrasparc.
> The 6.3.2 binaries have a bug with the \dt command, consequently, ODBC
> cannot
> see any tables. So I need to recompile which is itself another problem,
> hence my question:
>
> If I obtain the 6.3.2 sources, MUST I apply all patches to the code prior to
> compilation?

I have successfully compiled and now is running 6.3.2 without any
additional patches. Later I've applied and restart postgres with locale
patch.
No problems yet.

Sun Ultra-1, Solaris 2.5.1, gcc 2.8.1

Oleg.
----
Oleg Broytmann National Research Surgery Centre http://sun.med.ru/~phd/
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-14 16:34:02 Re: [ADMIN] Why my index does not increase performance?
Previous Message Gilley, Charles H. 1998-10-14 14:20:09 re: binary/build woes, procedural question