From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
Date: | 2006-06-22 17:50:36 |
Message-ID: | Pine.OSF.4.61.0606222047100.359248@kosh.hut.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 6/22/06, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> wrote:
>> If you INSERT into multiple partitions (by time -- say one per minute)
>> and TRUNCATE periodically (30 minute old partitions for 30 minute
>> expiry) it works much better. Expiring the session is quite fast as well
>> since they'll go away with the truncate.
>
> Forgive me if this sounds rude because I'm not meaning it as such, but
> this suggestion sounds like a MySQL-ish hack. No doubt it would work,
> but should an application-writer have to incur the cost of writing
> something different because the database can't handle it? I remember
> having to write subselect code in PHP because MySQL couldn't do it...
> not what I would call a *solution* by any mean.
AFAICS, you could hide it from the application with update rules and
views.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-06-22 17:51:05 | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-06-22 17:50:18 | Re: let's meet |