Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Date: 2006-06-22 17:50:36
Message-ID: Pine.OSF.4.61.0606222047100.359248@kosh.hut.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:

> On 6/22/06, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> wrote:
>> If you INSERT into multiple partitions (by time -- say one per minute)
>> and TRUNCATE periodically (30 minute old partitions for 30 minute
>> expiry) it works much better. Expiring the session is quite fast as well
>> since they'll go away with the truncate.
>
> Forgive me if this sounds rude because I'm not meaning it as such, but
> this suggestion sounds like a MySQL-ish hack. No doubt it would work,
> but should an application-writer have to incur the cost of writing
> something different because the database can't handle it? I remember
> having to write subselect code in PHP because MySQL couldn't do it...
> not what I would call a *solution* by any mean.

AFAICS, you could hide it from the application with update rules and
views.

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-06-22 17:51:05 Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-06-22 17:50:18 Re: let's meet