Re: NOTICE vs WARNING

From: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
Date: 2003-08-28 10:14:21
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.51.0308281913400.1359@angelic-vtfw.cvpn.cynic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

> Implicit froms aren't depreciated yet.

It would be really nice, to my mind, if they were killed stone dead.
I've been bitten several times by having an implicit FROM added to a
query that destroyed it.

cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.NetBSD.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2003-08-28 10:28:16 suspicous looking code in copy.c
Previous Message Justin Clift 2003-08-28 10:05:27 Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit