REMOVE

From: Chad Oblak <chad(at)freeshell(dot)org>
To: Josh Goldberg <josh(at)4dmatrix(dot)com>
Cc: postgres-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: REMOVE
Date: 2003-04-29 22:48:52
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.33.0304292248250.19513-100000@otaku.freeshell.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

REMOVE

On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Josh Goldberg wrote:

> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:26:59 -0700
> From: Josh Goldberg <josh(at)4dmatrix(dot)com>
> To: postgres-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: [ADMIN] backups and restores: -Fc vs. -Ft
>
> All this talk lately about problems using -Ft when restoring backups...I've always used -Fc. What other advantages/disadvantages are there to using the custom format as opposed to the tar format, besides the fact that tar has never reliably worked for me? Why are all you other admins (seemingly) dependent on having tar working, besides that it's really really cool when everything works as expected?
>
> Thanks in advance for the enlightenment :-)
>
> p.s. - fyi, here's my backup/restore method (I don't use the contrib lo, I just use the regular built-in stuff.):
> pg_dump -Fc -obf dumpfile -U mysuer mydatabase
> pg_restore -Fc -s -U myuser -d mydatabase dumpfile
> pg_restore -Fc -ao -U myuser -d mydatabase dumpfile
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message john 2003-04-29 23:37:08 vacuuming and freed disk space
Previous Message Josh Goldberg 2003-04-29 22:26:59 backups and restores: -Fc vs. -Ft