Re: The Business Case for PostgreSQL

From: Josh <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, Liam O'Duibhir <liamod(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au>
Subject: Re: The Business Case for PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-06-15 17:22:41
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0706151320420.32459@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


> You could be specific:
>
> No per cpu charges.
> No per machine charges.
> No "extra" functionality charges.
> Yes, more money for your business.

"PostgreSQL keeps more money in your company's coffers because you can use
all of its advanced functionality and increase the number of CPU's and
machines whenever you want without paying additional license fees."

-J

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-06-15 19:55:57 Re: How does the tsearch configuration get selected?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-06-15 17:12:00 Re: The Business Case for PostgreSQL