| From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Possible bug in 7.4.5 |
| Date: | 2004-10-06 14:37:56 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.61.0410061736390.1794@emo.org.tr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
>> Am I missing something, or is it a bug? I can't reproduce it in 8.0beta2.
<snip>
> whereas prior versions did the rollback but still reported the command
> tag as COMMIT. AFAIR, Postgres has always acted that way.
Ok got it, thanks.
Do we still need a backported fix? Software developers (PHP developers,
for example) may get confused from the error message they get.
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBZANGtl86P3SPfQ4RAtfnAJ0R64Y7/2yZqINTlNdgSI1mExg6vACg0XTb
cSA9IIv5Dng8k+ot3ylIQEw=
=/ykx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-06 14:39:48 | Re: Possible bug in 7.4.5 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-06 14:20:15 | Re: pg_dumpall bug in PG 8.0b3 Win32 port |