Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix
Date: 2007-01-08 02:50:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0701081349150.27762@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Perhaps even more to the point, what makes you think that someone
> >> will notice the warning? If the docs build is one step in an
> >> automated build process, this seems unlikely.
>
> > Taking a closer look, it's pretty much guaranteed that no one will see
> > them, because the targets they are attached to are intermediate,
> > normally followed by latex runs.
>
> If we think this is a problem, ISTM the correct answer is to just force
> a repeat jade run when doing "make all". The only objection to that
> AFAICS is that when you're doing docs work and only need a draft to
> look at, you'd rather it not run twice. But perhaps we could address
> that by providing a separate target, "make draft" say, that runs jade
> but once.

That's a nice approach. Those working on the docs will know about the
draft target and those just wanting to build the docs for publication will
get the result.

Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-08 04:10:03 Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-08 02:28:58 Re: Full page writes

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-08 04:10:03 Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-08 02:03:34 Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix