| From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2004-10-07 23:43:59 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0410080943280.20772@linuxworld.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Gavin Sherry wrote:
> > We cannot use named parameter notation with functions due to
> > overloading. Disregarding the idea of default values, consider:
> >
> > create function foo(i int, j int) ...
> > create function foo(j int, i int) ...
>
> That just means we cannot use the parameter name as a distinguishing
> factor in the overloading scheme. Which certainly makes a lot of sense
> to me.
The above example was a mistake. See other examples in the thread.
Thanks,
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-10-07 23:48:29 | Re: [HACKERS] DDL triggers [was Re: database constraints] |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-10-07 23:42:36 | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |