Re: Tablespace and cpu costs

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tablespace and cpu costs
Date: 2004-08-18 12:23:21
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0408182222110.2585@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Gaetano Mendola wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
> now that we have the tablespace support don't you think that
> each tablespace needs his own costs instead of a system wide
> one ?
>
> I searched in the archives and on the TODO list without success.

Yep. I've looked at this but didn't think it necessary for the first stage
of implementation.

I definately plan to do it for 8.1

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2004-08-18 13:42:05 8.0 libpq: missing get_home_path()
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-08-18 11:31:49 Tablespace and cpu costs