| From: | Klaus Naumann <kn(at)mgnet(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | markw(at)osdl(dot)org |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, kn(at)mgnet(dot)de, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
| Date: | 2004-07-20 16:29:30 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0407201825340.930@spock.intra.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 markw(at)osdl(dot)org wrote:
> FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "archive_mode"
>
> Have I missed something since it has been committed?
Yes, Tom has removed this option in favorite of just setting
archive_command to a value which then enables the PITR code also.
But as I've seen this isn't discussed to the very end currently.
My 2ct: I'd prefer to have archive_mode in the config as it really makes
clear that this database is archiving. I fear users will not understand
that giving a program for archival will also enable the PITR function.
Greetings, Klaus
--
Full Name : Klaus Naumann | (http://www.mgnet.de/) (Germany)
Phone / FAX : ++49/177/7862964 | E-Mail: (kn(at)mgnet(dot)de)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-20 17:27:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
| Previous Message | Daniel Caixeta Barroso | 2004-07-20 16:05:53 | unsubscribe |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-07-20 16:52:38 | Re: Why we really need timelines *now* in PITR |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-20 16:25:38 | Re: pg_config |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-20 16:35:49 | Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-20 16:25:38 | Re: pg_config |