Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases?

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases?
Date: 2004-05-03 16:57:31
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0405031852270.9381@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> A database owner who is not a superuser should *not* be able to fool with
> the built-in catalog entries.
>
> Database owner != superuser, and I don't want us blurring the distinction...

Yes sure. I agree, especially if the owner is one of my students;-)

However, I feel that the owner should own the "public" schema and maybe
some other stuff to be carefully selected, without bluring that important
distinction?

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sdv mailer 2004-05-03 17:35:10 Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2004-05-03 16:50:48 Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases?