patches in the pipe?

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: patches in the pipe?
Date: 2004-04-22 07:29:18
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0404220917591.6454@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


> Patch applied. Thanks.

I have 3 others somehow minor patches that are being submitted:

(1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions

(2) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCHES] 'information_schema' considered a system schema

(3) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:42:50 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCHES] guc variables flags explicitly initialisation

Could they be accepted/discussed/rejected as well?

patch (3) was somehow dismissed by Tom, so it may mean a final 'reject'.
As for (1) and (2), I answered all questions I received. (2) is somehow a
small bug fix. (1) adds a minor set of functions to access fields in
'aclitem'.

Thanks in advance,

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-04-22 08:45:08 Re: psql: \d+ shows OID-ness
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-04-22 07:24:01 Re: make 'PrivateRefCount' 32 bits wide