| From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "J(dot) Andrew Rogers" <jrogers(at)neopolitan(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PITR for replication? |
| Date: | 2004-04-02 01:50:36 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0404021149270.31427@linuxworld.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr |
On Fri, 1 Apr 2004, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
>
> I may be completely missing the point here, but it looks to me as though
> the PITR archival mechanism is also most of a native replication
> facility. Is there anyone reason this couldn't be extended to
> replication, and if so, is anyone planning on using it as such?
>
> My memory is fuzzy on this point, but I seem to recall that this is
> (was?) how replication is more-or-less done for many of the big
> commercial RDBMS.
Logfile shipping is one replication option some commercial vendors offer.
It doesn't solve all problems however. It is mostly used for hot backups
in my experience.
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-04-02 03:04:41 | Re: PITR for replication? |
| Previous Message | J. Andrew Rogers | 2004-04-02 00:58:28 | PITR for replication? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-04-02 02:29:03 | Re: Inconsistent behavior on Array & Is Null? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-04-02 01:12:23 | Re: Inconsistent behavior on Array & Is Null? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-04-02 03:04:41 | Re: PITR for replication? |
| Previous Message | J. Andrew Rogers | 2004-04-02 00:58:28 | PITR for replication? |