| From: | Andrew Klosterman <andrew5(at)ece(dot)cmu(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl |
| Date: | 2006-02-14 21:02:17 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.53L-ECE.CMU.EDU.0602141601120.29413@blossom.pdl.cmu.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
> We may be spending too much time on this one point --- as long as
> Kerberos isn't *writing* into the zero-length alloc, there is nothing
> illegal immoral or fattening about malloc(0). Can you get ElectricFence
> to not abort right here but continue on to the real problem?
>
> regards, tom lane
Doing a "man efence" lets me know that setting the EF_ALLOW_MALLOC_0
environment variable ought to let the program continue... I'll check into
that right now!
--Andrew J. Klosterman
andrew5(at)ece(dot)cmu(dot)edu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-02-14 21:10:33 | Re: BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-14 20:51:43 | Re: BUG #2246: Bad malloc interactions: ecpg, openssl |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-02-14 21:10:30 | Re: add additional options to CREATE TABLE ... AS |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-02-14 21:00:50 | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |