Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 09:22:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311181017150.3317-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Dave Page writes:

> Least interesting to many user perhaps, but lost of them seen to think
> that it's important for expanding our userbase:
> http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=9

That survey is a bit like asking television viewers, "What do you think
would attract the most new television viewers?"

33% -- better entertainment

That does not say that better entertainment will attract new viewers, just
that the existing viewers think that. Most nonviewers might in fact be
perfectly content with their way of living.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-11-18 09:45:56 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-11-18 08:22:45 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2003-11-18 09:40:24 Re: Background writer process
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-18 09:15:13 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?