From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Date: | 2003-11-17 23:46:56 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171546330.6852-100000@hosting.commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
If Win32 actually makes it into 7.5 then yes I believe 8.0 would be
appropriate.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Of course, while I was editing press releases at 2am, I started thinking about
> our next version. It seems certain that the next release, in 6-9 months,
> will have at a minimum the Windows port and ARC, if not Slony-I as well.
>
> Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0? Seems like
> even 7.4 is hardly recognizable as the same database as 7.0.
>
> I'm posting this to both Advocacy and Hackers because I think that some people
> will have rather different points of view on the issue. But I wanted to
> start a discussion early this time. No flamewars, please! We all want
> PostgreSQL to be the best possible database.
>
>
--
Co-Founder
Command Prompt, Inc.
The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-17 23:50:25 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | William Yu | 2003-11-17 23:43:07 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-17 23:50:25 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-17 23:46:38 | Release cycle length |