Re: Comparing databases

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Date: 2003-11-13 20:52:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311132147170.17499-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

scott.marlowe writes:

> I'm thinking we need to use the word cooperation or coorperate and diverse
> somewhere in there.
>
> Postgresql has qualified, dedicated, diverse support channels
> provided through the cooperation of both the user community and a
> number of longstanding commercial companies...

While using attractive words is important, don't lose the focus of what
you are trying to say. To me, playing devil's advocate, this sentence
raises more questions than it answers:

If I want to support, do I have to make use of the user community or can I
go straight to the companies?

How is "qualified, dedicated" measured? Do the dedicated supporters sit
around waiting for my call all day? What does this actually mean?

Why are there no short-standing companies? No dynamic potential for
newcomers in this area? What is "long" anyway?

Etc.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-13 21:09:52 Re: Comparing databases
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-13 20:31:57 Re: Comparing databases