| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Call for port reports |
| Date: | 2003-10-24 22:04:14 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0310250000580.18767-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Does -O0 override an earlier -O2? I wonder if it is just complaining
> when it sees -O2 and is actually using -O for the compile. We still
> need to fix that, but I am curious.
If you specify -O2 anywhere and the compile step is invoked (for example,
you're not just preprocessing or just linking), then the warning is
issued. However, further investigation showed that the last optimization
option on the command line is the one that is actually used to perform the
optimizations.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-10-24 22:07:40 | Re: Call for port reports |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-10-24 22:00:34 | Re: Call for port reports -- Failure on Linux |