Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!
Date: 2003-10-09 00:24:24
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310090215450.26413-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Well, this is really embarassing. I can't imagine why we would not set
> at least -O on all platforms. Looking at the template files, I see
> these have no optimization set:

> freebsd (non-alpha)

I'm wondering what that had in mind:

http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/template/freebsd.diff?r1=1.10&r2=1.11

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 01:44:26 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-09 00:06:59 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 01:44:26 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-09 00:06:59 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!