Re: more i18n/l10n issues

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more i18n/l10n issues
Date: 2003-09-30 09:18:02
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309301116100.6281-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan writes:

> I have been wondering if moving to XML for config files might be a good
> idea - and if there are going to be GUIs that write them that gives some
> more impetus to the idea.

What I would like to see done is keeping the GUC data, that is, the name,
the properties, and the description, in some certralized store and
generate code and documentation from that. It could be done with XML,
SGML, m4 -- I don't care.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-30 09:24:50 Re: more i18n/l10n issues
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2003-09-30 07:47:24 Re: expanding on syslog help