Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Date: 2003-09-04 18:53:54
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309042052110.1488-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan writes:

> Having parsed it what would it do with it?

Nothing.

> Surely if IP6 isn't configured in then having an IP6 address in
> pg_hba.conf is an error.

Arguably, but not surely.

> If Andreas Pflug's patch (with Kurt's caveat) and my patch are applied,
> then I really think there won't be any more difficulties in this area.

Ignoring that I don't like one of the submitted patches, this still won't
get us an pg_hba.conf that works out of the box for sites using IPv6.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-04 18:54:26 Re: ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-09-04 18:53:25 Re: PG7.5