Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON ALTER

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON ALTER
Date: 2003-05-23 22:34:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0305231738310.5719-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus writes:

> Another good point. Makes sense to just do GRANT ALTER then, which would
> cover DROP as well.

If you have the privilege to alter an object you are nearly equivalent to
the owner of the object. A more useful approach might be group ownership
of objects.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-05-23 22:35:43 Domain casting still not working right?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-05-23 20:34:48 Simplifying varchar and bpchar behavior