Text format protocol representation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Text format protocol representation
Date: 2003-05-13 22:47:46
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0305140028200.1617-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

What's the rationale for not including the trailing zero byte in the
protocol representation of the text format? The output functions of data
types generate one, and the client most likely wants one, so it seems
unreasonable that the protocol cuts it out and the client has to put it
back. Is the bandwidth saved worth the extra computation?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-05-13 22:48:02 Re: [INTERFACES] Last round (I think) of FE/BE protocol changes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-05-13 22:46:47 Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs