Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs
Date: 2003-05-13 08:04:03
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0305131002430.1617-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane writes:

> > {"server_encoding", PGC_USERSET}, &server_encoding_string,
> > "SQL_ASCII", assign_server_encoding, show_server_encoding
>
> I'm not sure why this one is marked PGC_USERSET --- seems like it should
> not be possible to override it from SET. It should be documented as a
> read-only option, I think. (Looks ... actually it is set up that way
> in CVS tip.)

Do we even need this one? If you want to find out the server encoding
(which should be rare anyway), you can select it from pg_database.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message postgresql 2003-05-13 09:01:42 can we implement the updatable view through rule system?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-05-13 05:25:05 Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2003-05-13 09:08:40 Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-05-13 05:25:05 Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs