Re: Win32 defines

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 defines
Date: 2003-04-05 23:59:56
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0304060159010.2083-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway writes:

> If we finish the native Win32 port, is there any need to keep the cygwin
> stuff around?

Yes, because some people use it.

Why, you ask? For the same reason they are using Cygwin in the first
place.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-04-07 02:12:31 Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-04-05 19:40:01 Re: Win32 defines