Re: Oracle rant

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle rant
Date: 2003-01-16 21:55:36
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0301161950540.789-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder writes:

> - postgres should auto-tune itself - the *cost could perhaps be
> adjusted after some statistics have been collected, and there should be
> some sensible way to determine an optimal setting for the famous
> shared_buffers (and the default should be something that gets reasonable
> performance on common cases)

Over the last couple of years PostgreSQL has transformed from hardly
configurable to fully configurable. Currently we're in a mode where we
add new configuration parameters whenever there's a degree of uncertainty.
Sooner rather than later we need to shift to the next phase, which is as
you say autoconfiguration, because ease of administration is one of the
great advantages of PostgreSQL.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

  • Re: Oracle rant at 2003-01-16 06:56:02 from Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-16 21:55:50 Re: copying perms to another user
Previous Message greg 2003-01-16 21:47:00 Re: v7.3.1 psql against a v7.2.x database ...