| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql and readline |
| Date: | 2003-01-09 21:49:42 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0301092042410.29178-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> The case I find interesting is where you're using plain "\e" to
> re-edit a query interactively. If this query never gets into the
> history buffer then you're lost: you won't be able to pull it back
> for re-editing a second time.
If you call \e again immediately then you edit the previous command.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-09 21:50:35 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-09 21:49:33 | Re: psql and readline |