Re: minor SGML fix

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minor SGML fix
Date: 2002-11-11 18:14:38
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0211111914050.12428-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway writes:

> BTW, should we be marking 'psql', 'pg_dump', and other client-side
> utilities in <application> tags or <command> tags?

Depends on whether you speak of the application or the command. ;-)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-11 19:06:54 Re: minor SGML fix
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-11 18:08:30 Re: MemSet inline for newNode