Re: minor SGML fix

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minor SGML fix
Date: 2002-11-11 19:06:54
Message-ID: 200211111906.gABJ6sd17065@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Neil Conway writes:
>
> > BTW, should we be marking 'psql', 'pg_dump', and other client-side
> > utilities in <application> tags or <command> tags?
>
> Depends on whether you speak of the application or the command. ;-)

Peter, please elaborate on that.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-11 19:18:15 Re: MemSet inline for newNode
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-11-11 18:14:38 Re: minor SGML fix