| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inconsistent Conversion Names |
| Date: | 2002-09-19 17:57:06 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0209191955490.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> The conversion named "SJIS" is different from IANA's "shift_jis". It
> actually matches "Windows-31J" in IANA, which is too ugly to being
> emploied as our conversion name, IMO.
OK
> I agree with win1250 -> windows_1250, win1251 -> windows_1251, but do
> not agree with renaming win866. There's no windows_866 in IANA. Maybe
> that should be "ibm866"?
Is it ibm866 or are you wondering yourself?
> Someone said that the conversion table is actually koi8r + koi8u,
> being different from IANA's koi8_r. Not sure though.
I found mention in the archives by Oleg B. that it is in fact koi8_r.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-19 18:06:05 | Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-09-19 17:53:28 | Re: unaccent |