| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
| Date: | 2002-09-16 17:25:04 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0209161837000.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Clift writes:
> WinNT/2k/XP costs a few hundred dollars.
>
> MS SQL Server costs a few thousand dollars.
The places that run Windows can be categorized into three camps: (1)
Those that don't have a clue. They will never run PostgreSQL. (2) Those
that are somehow afraid to switch to a different solution. They will be
even more hesitant to switch to PostgreSQL. (3) Those that somehow like
Windows. They will like MS SQL Server as well, no matter what we do.
So where is the market?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-09-16 17:25:30 | Re: directional marks |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-09-16 17:15:20 | Re: An opportunity to prove PostgreSQL and our requirement of Case Study info |