Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Curt Sampson" <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-17 02:04:26
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAEECCEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The places that run Windows can be categorized into three camps: (1)
> Those that don't have a clue. They will never run PostgreSQL. (2) Those
> that are somehow afraid to switch to a different solution. They will be
> even more hesitant to switch to PostgreSQL. (3) Those that somehow like
> Windows. They will like MS SQL Server as well, no matter what we do.
>
> So where is the market?

Ask MySQL - they have many, many Windows users.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-09-17 04:03:12 attlognum
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-09-17 01:30:47 Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump