Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.

From: Richard Troy <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Patrick Earl <patearl(at)patearl(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Date: 2007-01-11 22:01:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0701111356210.15093-100000@denzel.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

...snip...
>
> (You know, of course, that my opinion is that no sane person would run a
> production database on Windows in the first place. So the data-loss
> risk to me seems less of a problem than the unexpected-failures problem.
> It's not like there aren't a ton of other data-loss scenarios in that OS
> that we can't do anything about...)
>
> regards, tom lane
>

PLEASE OH PLEASE document every f-ing one of them! (And I don't mean
document Windows issues as comments in the source code. Best would be in
the official documentation/on a web page.) On occasion, I could *really*
use such a list! (If such already exists, please point me at it!)

Thing is, Tom, not everybody has the same level of information you have on
the subject...

Regards,
Richard

--
Richard Troy, Chief Scientist
Science Tools Corporation
510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263
rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com, http://ScienceTools.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2007-01-11 22:13:31 Re: Trying to load MySQL data
Previous Message Jeanna Geier 2007-01-11 22:00:52 Re: RESTORE Error

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-11 22:26:55 Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade
Previous Message Kim 2007-01-11 21:52:23 Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade