| From: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL general list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DBs and Schemas |
| Date: | 2004-01-07 01:41:45 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0401061737390.9699-100000@main.cyber-office.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Are you actually going to be doing joins between these applications?
> If not, why not setup multiple databases, then you can be sure they
> won't conflict.
Well in at least one situation I can think of there will be joins. And
with a minimum of six applications for a company/organization that adds up
to quite a bit of admin work when there are several company/organizations.
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-01-07 01:46:25 | Re: Paypal WAS: PostgreSQL speakers needed for |
| Previous Message | Chris Ochs | 2004-01-07 00:52:12 | problems with transaction blocks |